The Nissan Sentra SE-R You Don’t Want To Buy

The Freshman 15 Didn’t Do Any Good To The Nissan Sentra SE-R

Ok, ok, ok. I have a slight obsession with the Nissan Sentra SE-R produced from 1991-1994.  It’s not my fault though.  Nissan did a horrible job trying to replace it.  Nissan tried with the 1995 200SX SE-R, but it couldn’t even be loved by it’s own mother. Two generations span the worst Nissan Sentra SE-R of all time. They are know as the B15 (2001-2006) and the B16 ( 2007- 2012).  And any enthusiast with a brain wouldn’t touch the Nissan Sentra SE-R of today.

Decals…mmmmm…decals

I hate the Nissan Sentra SE-R produced from 2001-2012.  HATE.  Not one time did it take home a Car and Driver 10 Best Award.  Not only that but it couldn’t take home a comparison test trophy.  It gives the Nissan Sentra SE-R a bad name.  By comparison the first generation SE-R was on the Car and Driver’s 10 Best list ever year it was produced!

Here’s Why The 2001-2012 Nissan Sentra SE-R Is Bad

The original SE-R weighed in at 2,200 lbs.   Had a 2.0-liter engine with 140 hp. And was perfectly balanced.  Nissan was never able to find the balance of the original Sentra SE-R.  Like Mazda was able to with their newest Miata.

My one true love…

The B15 and B16 SE-R came from the factory with the base Nissan Altima engine. A 2.5-liter DOHC engine that made 180 hp and 180 lb-ft of torque in “Spec V” trim.  Ten years later it couldn’t even beat the original SE-R’s 0-60 time of 7.5 seconds. They are heavier than the golden child B13 (1991-1994) Sentra SE-R.  And the shifter might be made of J-E-L-L-O.

More Always Isn’t Better

I think this is a perfect example of the fact that more always isn’t better.  It’s a humans natural instinct to always want more.  More power, More money, More space.  But when does “more” stop and lose it’s value? The Nissan Sentra is a perfect example of how adding more ended up in a loss.

Total
0
Shares
6 comments
  1. The B13 SE-R is a gem. Mine was the best FWD car I’ve ever owned. It’s really too bad Nissan couldn’t carry that winning formula forward instead of just the name.

    1. So much bad information. A B16 SpecV has better power to weight ratio, runs a faster 0 to 60 (6.7 to 7.5) and a faster 1/4 mile (15.1 to 15.8).

      Stock for stock, a B16 is just a better car all around.

  2. Having owned both B14 and B15 SE-R’s, as well as a non-SER B13, I have to concur. The B14 was fun but bloated-looking, the B15 was a good car except for the shifter but didn’t come close to the balance of the B13 platform or the spirit of the SR20. The ’92 B13 XE was the best-handling front-driver I’ve ever driven, and was a blast even with the 1.6.

    1. Thanks for reading and the comment Christopher. Sounds like you are a Sentra enthusiasts! Glad that you agree and it’s a shame most B13s are destroyed today.

      1. More of a Nissan enthusiast in general, at least the older models. I have an S12 200SX in my garage undergoing a mild restoration.

Let Us Know What You Think

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Post

Never Forget That The Toyota 86 Exists

Next Post

Is There An Enthusiast Car That Is Safe And Cheap?

Related Posts
Total
0
Share
%d bloggers like this: